MRC-5: Know What That Is?

If you’ve never heard about MRC-5, here’s a little info to get you started on doing your homework.

~ Natural Nana ~

~~~~~

New Data Shows DNA From Aborted Fetal Cell Lines in Vaccines

The Italian vaccine research and advocacy organization Corvelva recently released new data regarding the use of aborted fetal cell lines in vaccines. The research reports the results produced from the MRC 5 cell line analysis, particularly the one contained in GlaxoSmithKline’s tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-chickenpox (MMRV) vaccine.

The Corvelva team summarized their findings as follows:

1- The fetal cell line was found to belong to a male fetus.

2- The cell line presents itself in such a way that it is likely to be very old, thus consistent with the declared line of the 1960s.

3- The fetal human DNA represented in this vaccine is a complete individual genome, that is, the genomic DNA of all the chromosomes of an individual is present in the vaccine.

4- The human genomic DNA contained in this vaccine is clearly, undoubtedly abnormal, presenting important inconsistencies with a typical human genome, that is, with that of a healthy individual.

5- 560 genes known to be associated with forms of cancer were tested and all underwent major modifications.

6- There are variations whose consequences are not even known, not yet appearing in the literature, but which still affect genes involved in the induction of human cancer.

7- What is also clearly abnormal is the genome excess showing changes in the number of copies and structural variants.

…the DNA contained in these vaccines is potentially TUMORIGENIC…
Corvelva notes that, according to the guidelines (which are found in the report), the presence of fetal DNA from cell lines MRC-5 and WI-38, as diploids, does not provide for upper limits: there is no limit to the amount they can find inside a vaccine. The motivation lies in the fact that these lines are not considered tumors because they have a “finite” (not immortalized) replicative cycle.

But the reference literature is obsolete. The first genetic anomalies were found on these lines, considered negligible for the safety of vaccines 40 years ago and, as reported in the WHO guidelines, since then no updates have been made with new sequencing technologies, particularly in Next Generation Sequencing (NGS); the consequence is that inside the vaccines that have been administered for decades is the presence of a progressively more genetically modified DNA and uncontrolled quantities has been allowed. The Next NGS is the methodology used by Corvelva for metagenomic analysis and the laboratory we used is located in the United States. Our analyses are constantly confirmed by several laboratories, the continuous verification of the initially obtained data is leading to consolidate not only the data itself, but the methods themselves.

What are we saying? We are saying that the DNA contained in these vaccines is potentially TUMORIGENIC and that the guidelines to which the supervisory bodies are appealing are NOT ADEQUATE. Moreover, we are publicly denouncing a SERIOUS OMISSION in taking those PRECAUTIONAL measures which, on the other hand, are urgently requested for antacid drugs.

…this vaccine should be considered defective and potentially dangerous to human health…
Our results greatly reinforce the experimental observations of Dr. Theresa Deisher and especially the fact that the contaminant fetal DNA present in all samples analyzed in varying quantities (thus uncontrolled) is up to 300 times higher than the limit imposed by the EMA for carcinogenic DNA (10 ng/dose, corresponding to DNA contained in approximately 1000 tumor cells, derived from a statistical calculation, while the precautionary limit is 10 pg/dose), a limit that must also be applied to MRC-5 fetal DNA which inevitably contaminates Priorix tetra.

As a consequence, this vaccine should be considered defective and potentially dangerous to human health, in particular to the pediatric population which is much more vulnerable to genetic and autoimmune damage.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/…/new-data-shows-aborte…/

MRC-5
https://www.clsgmbh.de/pdf/mrc-5.pdf

Optimization of a MRC-5 cell culture process for the production of a smallpox vaccine
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/…/…/10616_2005_Article_4022.pdf

Isolation and replication in human fibroblast cells (MRC-5) of a microsporidian from an AIDS patient
https://www.academia.edu/…/Isolation_and_replication_in_hum…

Selected Profiles of Cell Cultures
http://www.soundchoice.org/…/Appendix-J-MRC-5-derivation-an…

Vaccinegate: MRC-5 contained in Priorix Tetra – Complete genome sequencing (MMR)
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/…/CORVELVA-MRC-5-contain…

Comparison of WI-38, MRC-5, and IMR-90 cell strains for isolation of viruses from clinical specimens.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC274969/

EXPERT COMMITTEE ON BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION
Geneva – 8 to 12 October 2007
Replacement Seed Stock for MRC-5 cells
https://www.who.int/biologicals/BS%202077%20MRC-5.pdf

MRC-5 (ATCC® CCL-171)
https://www.atcc.org/products/all/CCL-171.aspx

Listen to Christopher Key speak to the CDC about MRC-5 in vaccines – https://gopro.com/v/621ngR73w9NLv

Published by Natural Nana

Vaccine injury & stage 3 COPD survivor - thanks to use of real food as medicine.

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

  1. It’s aporling that they could even think of such a thing as vaccinating some one with this basically it murder in the first degree it’s just as bad as a shit gun cis that’s exactly what it is there shooting to kill

    Like

  2. Since when did mmr vaccine include chicken pox? Is this correct?
    I need this clarified before sharing. Thanks

    Like

  3. Polysorbates, DNA from animals/insects, formaldehyde, nano particulates for bots to interface with artificial intelligence with your personal biometrics, mercury, aluminium, mrc 5 cell lines, all these are known toxins and poison………what in Gods name is going on here with all this sorcery and alchemy. Avoid all vaxxxs. Don’t let them jab you or your family members……Under any circumstances.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Reblogged this on Ingaorama and commented:
    …the DNA contained in these vaccines is potentially TUMORIGENIC…
    Corvelva notes that, according to the guidelines (which are found in the report), the presence of fetal DNA from cell lines MRC-5 and WI-38, as diploids, does not provide for upper limits: there is no limit to the amount they can find inside a vaccine. The motivation lies in the fact that these lines are not considered tumors because they have a “finite” (not immortalized) replicative cycle.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: